My life as a writer and thinker never
much coincided with my life as a student. It is not that I did not
learn many important skills and lessons in the classroom because
I did. It is just that rarely did what was most important to me intersect
with what we were studying in school. Let me be more specific. My
high school English teacher urged me to take the rigorous AP English
class when I was in my junior year. A serious athlete with workouts
before and after school, I went with the easier class so as to cut
down on my homework load. A UCLA professor once urged me to enter
a paper into an undergraduate writing contest. More interested in
seducing the pretty coed in the front row of the lecture hall, I
let the opportunity pass me by. I never was much for letting school
get in the way of my education. Almost all my formal schooling was
in history, political science, and international relations - next
to none of it in literature; and I passed easily my English teacher
qualification tests due only to a kind father who read Yeats' poetry
to us at the dinner table and would buy me any book I wanted, no
questions asked - an arrangement which resulted in many book purchases
over the years.
      I did learn grammar and spelling in elementary
school, and was pushed greatly in high school by certain stern old
lady who taught English literature and would flunk me if I did not
give her my absolute best effort. How I enjoyed the contest of writing
her essays! But I am a Protestant at heart when it comes to reading,
preferring no priestly intermediaries between me and the Word. Such
it was in the beginning, so it is today. As writers, we all need
mentors and cheerleaders. But teachers of writing? As someone who
has pretended to that title, I have been humbled. The terror of sitting
down in front of a blank piece of paper with pen in hand is not something
that can be made easier by someone else. Writing is not a group activity,
and I strongly suspect it is no more possible to teach someone how
to write than it is to teach them how to think. Nobody ever "taught" me
how to write, but there is a little of every author I ever enjoyed
in my prose.
      My experience in "teaching" writing so
far has been less than satisfactory. I have always been a voracious
reader, and it still nonpluses me to hear a student tell me they
don't like to read. You announce a period of time in class for free
reading, and the students moan as if it were a punishment. Despite
hours of teaching topic sentences, paragraph organization, and countless
hours of editing drafts of student essay, the writing is not close
to what it could be; and I am tired of the science or religion or
the math teacher complaining about the poor writing of students!
It is eminently demoralizing! I wonder if the momentum we have built
up in the last two and half centuries of progress in the written
word is at risk of being destroyed by the deafening, omnipresent
roar of the "white noise" of television and a mass media more concerned
with the titillation of images than the search for truth or meaning.
Aristotle began his Metaphysics by claiming that "all men
by nature desire to know"; television is threatening to replace that
noble maxim with "all men desire to be entertained." We become conditioned
to sit back passively and be entertained by stimulating images, loud
music, skeptical story-lines, and adrenaline-pumping violent action.
      School? Books? The written word? I wonder
if we English teachers today in America are not the most forsaken
of creatures; the path of least resistance to me would seem to move
full-time to teaching History, supposedly the least favorite of academic
subjects to students today. What should I do? Not only are students
often nearly illiterate, but even many of my fellow "teachers" find
it difficult to pass basic instructor qualification tests! I could
do some other job.
      Am I an American? Can I be a serious
reader, in the private sense, and yet still be fully an American?
Without a doubt 99.9% of what I see in the popular American culture
of sports, movies, and rock music interests me not at all. I sometimes
pause to scratch my head and scour my brain to see if I have not
missed something basic when I reflect how much money, attention,
and fame revolves around puffed-up actors, models, sports figures,
and television "personalities" in the cult of Hollywood celebrity
where it is more important to cut a fine figure than to achieve anything
of lasting value. "You're not anybody in America if you're not
on TV," goes a particularly mordant line in a recent movie said
by a vapid television newswoman. "What's the point of doing anything
worthwhile if nobody's watching?" As if you don't see it in the
media, it didn't happen and/or lacks importance! What rubbish! It
seems to be just the opposite with me: I threw my television out
the window in a fit of frustration many years ago and have lived
without a TV ever since. The older I get, the fewer are the brawls
in practical politics which actively engage my imagination. I read
more and more of the newspapers and weeklies every year and it takes
me less and less time. I read two or three books at a time, but rarely
anything written less than 50 years ago. Does this leave me "disengaged"?
Am I still a full-fledged American? Am I not disqualified to teach
contemporary American teenagers, growing up as they are in the digital
age of images and technology? What should I do?
      I write maybe a few hundred words every
day and have done so for the last seven or eight years. That for
me is a writer: someone who writes every day, an individual who processes
experience through the medium of words and records it as such. It
matters to me not at all if a person writes well or not, been published
or not. They write every day and they are a writer. Period. But I
have never gotten on well with the community of writers in my own
country: I would rather swallow my teeth than go to a poetry reading;
I would rather kiss a gorilla than join a book reading club. I look
at the various gladiator bloodletting among rival cliques in the
literary community and wonder if the savagery of their infighting
is made only more vicious because it means nothing to anybody outside
of the chattering classes of literary New York and San Francisco!
I read the latest university English journal and marvel at the barbarous
prose of trendy academic jargon, so divorced from real life and the
central concerns of the human heart. It is as if we were back in
the Medieval Age of Scholasticism, with a few anointed priests writing
to and for a handful of other cloistered clerics over minor issues
of abstruse theological disputation which only they understand! They "deconstruct
text" rather than read books, and then they insult their readers
by playing clever literary games rather than telling stories which
are worth anybody's precious time to read. It frankly astounds me
that persons aspiring to the honorable title of "author" would disrespect
their readers so!
      I apologize if I begin to sound like
something I am not: a curmudgeon. But I mention all this to underline
the fact that my life as a reader and writer is and has always been
irreducibly solitary. My brothers line the walls of my library, and
the evening when I relax with an old friend in the form of a musty
leather-bound book is by far the time of day when I am most vibrant
and alive. I nearly gasped when I first read the following advice
from William Penn to his children about how to read: